<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Full Frame &#187; Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vividomaha.com/blog/tag/film/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vividomaha.com/blog</link>
	<description>Research, Product Reviews, Free Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Megapixels (MP) Are Required for X Print?</title>
		<link>http://www.vividomaha.com/blog/2009/11/25/how-many-megapixels-mp-are-required-for-x-print</link>
		<comments>http://www.vividomaha.com/blog/2009/11/25/how-many-megapixels-mp-are-required-for-x-print#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vividomaha.com/blog/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you are probably thinking/asking how many megapixels are required for a 4&#215;6 print? or a 8&#215;10? or a 24&#215;36? Here is a small table of the minimum sizes (at 300dpi) high quality: Printed Size Min. Resolution Megapixels 4&#215;6 1200x1800px 2.2 MP 5&#215;7 1500x2100px 3.2 MP 8&#215;10 2400x3000px 7.2 MP 8.5&#215;11 2550x3300px 8.4 MP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you are probably thinking/asking how many megapixels are required for a 4&#215;6 print? or a 8&#215;10? or a 24&#215;36?</p>
<p>Here is a small table of the minimum sizes (at 300dpi) <strong>high quality</strong>:</p>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<th>  <strong>Printed Size</strong>  </th>
<th>  <strong>Min. Resolution</strong>  </th>
<th>  <strong>Megapixels</strong>  </th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4&#215;6</td>
<td>1200x1800px</td>
<td>2.2 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5&#215;7</td>
<td>1500x2100px</td>
<td>3.2 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8&#215;10</td>
<td>2400x3000px</td>
<td>7.2 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8.5&#215;11</td>
<td>2550x3300px</td>
<td>8.4 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13&#215;19</td>
<td>3900x5700px</td>
<td>22.2 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20&#215;30</td>
<td>6000x9000px</td>
<td>54.0 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>24&#215;36</td>
<td>7200x10800px</td>
<td>77.8 MP</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Here is a small table of the minimum sizes (at 150dpi) <strong>bare minimum</strong>:</p>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<th>  <strong>Printed Size</strong>  </th>
<th>  <strong>Min. Resolution</strong>  </th>
<th>  <strong>Megapixels</strong>  </th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4&#215;6</td>
<td>600x900px</td>
<td>0.54 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5&#215;7</td>
<td>750x1050px</td>
<td>0.8 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8&#215;10</td>
<td>1200x1500px</td>
<td>1.8 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8.5&#215;11</td>
<td>1275x1650px</td>
<td>2.1 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13&#215;19</td>
<td>1950x2850px</td>
<td>5.6 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20&#215;30</td>
<td>3000x4500px</td>
<td>13.5 MP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>24&#215;36</td>
<td>3600x5400px</td>
<td>19.4 MP</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>As you can see, actual pixel count is fairly demanding for a &#8220;high quality&#8221; print. High quality meaning what is <strong>actually</strong> observed by the camera and not made up by some computer program. Typically computers are used with a algorithm called a Bayer Interpolation that will blend and &#8220;guess&#8221; the colors to make up missing information between colors and pixels when someone tries to enlarge them, so it is possible to get an OK looking 8&#215;10 from a 5 MP camera, or an OK looking 24&#215;36 from a 22MP camera. So keep in mind that if you are producing any of these sizes with less than the Megapixels listed your print is more a test of the quality of your computer software than it is your camera!</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that imaging sensors will see only one color and one intensity per pixel. So 1 px will see red at lets say a value of 210 (1 to 255 intensity, <strong>16 Bit color</strong>). <strong>In order to record the real color emitted in real life you need at least 3 of these.</strong> Yes, just like your TV or anything else the camera will blend the 3 colors to create the real &#8220;observed&#8221; color. What is the caveat for this? Digital cameras (non-Foveon) only really &#8220;see&#8221; 1/3 of the claimed Megapixel value that they advertise (because they are using 3 pixels to record each &#8220;real&#8221; color) so that fancy 10 MP camera you own in reality only can record 3.3 MP worth of actual real life image, just enough for a high quality 5&#215;7, the rest is blended and made up by computer software. <strong>This makes a strong case for the reason why REAL professional photographers still use film for all of their important work.</strong> This is because film CAN record a real color at each &#8220;pixel&#8221; which is still higher than digital <strong>(roughly 88 real megapixels for a 35mm piece of film)</strong>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vividomaha.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F25%2Fhow-many-megapixels-mp-are-required-for-x-print&amp;linkname=How%20Many%20Megapixels%20%28MP%29%20Are%20Required%20for%20X%20Print%3F">Email & Share</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vividomaha.com/blog/2009/11/25/how-many-megapixels-mp-are-required-for-x-print/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
